Difference between revisions of "Clean license conditions"

From Clean
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Clean and its standard libraries are available under two different licenses:
 
Clean and its standard libraries are available under two different licenses:
  
* The LGPL, the standard GNU Lesser General Open Source license, which is free of charge.
+
* The LGPL, the standard GNU Lesser General Open Source license, which is free of charge
* A commercial license that can be obtained from Prof.dr.ir. M.J. Plasmeijer, preferably via email: [mailto:rinus@cs.ru.nl rinus@cs.ru.nl].
+
* A commercial license that can be obtained from Prof.dr.ir. M.J. Plasmeijer, preferably via email: [mailto:rinus@cs.ru.nl rinus@cs.ru.nl]
  
 
Note, that development under the LGPL license entails some restrictions and responsibilities. More information on the nature of the LGPL is available at http://www.gnu.org/ and http://www.opensource.org .
 
Note, that development under the LGPL license entails some restrictions and responsibilities. More information on the nature of the LGPL is available at http://www.gnu.org/ and http://www.opensource.org .

Revision as of 13:14, 6 July 2010

Clean and its standard libraries are available under two different licenses:

  • The LGPL, the standard GNU Lesser General Open Source license, which is free of charge
  • A commercial license that can be obtained from Prof.dr.ir. M.J. Plasmeijer, preferably via email: rinus@cs.ru.nl

Note, that development under the LGPL license entails some restrictions and responsibilities. More information on the nature of the LGPL is available at http://www.gnu.org/ and http://www.opensource.org .

A commercial license has the advantage that one is not obligated to make source code available. It furthermore gives right to technical support and is highly appreciated as a sign that you appreciate our work.

Users can choose under which license they wish to operate under.

December 12, 2002.